Scientists have discovered the oldest and most complete fossil of a human ancestor.
An incredible 95 percent complete fossil of a 47-million-year-old human ancestor dubbed Ida has been discovered and, after two years of secret study, an international team of scientists has revealed it to the world. The fossil’s remarkable state of preservation allows an unprecedented glimpse into early human evolution. Discovered in Messel Pit, Germany, it represents the moment before anthropoid primates--the group that would later evolve into humans, apes and monkeys--began to split from lemurs and other prosimian primates. This groundbreaking discovery fills in a critical gap in human and primate evolution.

A cast of the specimen will be on display in the "Extreme Mammals"
exhibition at the American Museum of Natural History in New York City
 
      Truly an amazing discover but what about the history that followed the first civilizations. In America we are taught that the first civilizations were in current day China and Iraq. But their are many missing pieces or shall I say missing links to the puzzle that may never be discovered due to the fact that the greatest library that held such knowledge was burned down in Alexandria, Egypt about 2000 years ago.
In that library it was known to many as a place that held written scriptures and tablets that explained the first civilizations.But their are a lot of theoretical thinkers that gave other ideas from when and when society was created. And in this I would like to share these radical thinkers and what is perhaps the real truth of our World history. One of these scientist was Clive Cussler.  Cussler along with a few others developed these theories( http://conservativebooktalk.com/2008/11/11/atlantis-found-by-clive-cussler/hat) that give a different view and outlook to what we were taught in school and some college. Cussler believed that their was a society that was highly advanced known to many as "Atlantis" and that it eventually sunk in the Atlantic Ocean. To see his entire theories and this one go to this link listed: http://conservativebooktalk.com/2008/11/11/atlantis-found-by-clive-cussler/. His ideas and theories are good but lack many things one being a way prove to the science community some proof.  But to be honest most history is based by theories and accepted by the science community so it is quite ironic.

 
       Originally before I read anything or knew anything about Clive Cussler I derived the same theory from various sources. But unlike Cussler I have discovered the proof needed to unlock the mystery and eventually to help oneday prove to the science community that Atlantis was a real place. My theory about it differs from Cusslers but it has many of the same attributes. I will list a synopsis of this theory and how I came about it. First, I believe that "Atlantis" is located between North Africa and South America and about the size of California and had a few mountain regions which can still be seen today as land masses such as the Bahamas, Cuba, and perhaps a few others. I believe it had it's own government and its' own religion, along with a sound societal structure and the first people who developed the first earliest versions of Algebra and Geometry. I believe also the society began around 75,000 years ago.  Now around 30,000 Bce the Bearing Straight which connected North America to Russia began to melt. The people of Atlantis knew this from either watching the sea level rising and slowly encroaching on their land or from another source. In any case of how do they determined this, they began to prepare to leave their home. Atlantis would split into two parts, to the west of the island facing the America's the people would go to current day Brazil and to the East facing North Africa they would go to Egypt. Both societies would begin to rebuild their structures and begin using the technology and knowledge the people of Atlantis brought with them. The only problems they had were that both societies had different land and soil from what they were used to. The Atlantians that ended up in South America and had problems because they had only original use to salt water until they discovered some fresh lakes, these dense jungles and only small places for fresh water caused them to build their structures differently. The Atlantians to the east built their structures much like they did in the Atlantis. The Nile provided fresh water and a road way to build their structures much easier then those in South America. Both societies in anycase flourished and survived to become the standards and amazement's of the known worlds.
 
      Proof: In 1997 they discovered in the Bermuda Triangle a tip of a pyramid but dismissed it for a strange natural formation. The problem is the Bermuda triangle is very deep and the structures built have been covered by trillions of tons of sand along with age they are having a difficult time around that region due to the problems with the magnetic or polar flare ups. The final problem is noone has spent any real money which would cost in the billions to do a full excavation of the area where Atlantis once existed. But other evidence lies in the two societies that split. The Egyptians and perhaps the Mayans.  First, the carbon dating of both Mayan structures and Egyptian ones are similar. And remember both societies had to deal with different problems which caused progression to be different in both civilizations. Another things that provides evidence that they came from one society at onetime is their use of mathematics and use of celestial heavens as a base of the way they built their structures. Second, their religion is similar. Both societies had sacrifices and built these elaborate tombs for the dead. Their Gods are alike and so is their understanding of how the universe played a role in their religion and building.
Finally, and the most poweful use is their uncanny abilities to understand the universe. In the science community it is well known that every 36,000 thousand years the earths' magnetic polar shifts. This was discovered in the Mayans long colander and I believe one day when it is found in Egypt they will discover they as well predicted this. The Mayan society did not exist when this occurred and even if it did would not understand this. But if the society came from a society such as Atlantis they perhaps could. Now the differences in language and other things maybe due to the facts that these people had to adapt to others who already lived in these lands some hostile. Also, everything such as structures had to be rebuilt. This would affect timeline of why the Mayans and Egyptians never united to our knowledge. Events such as war ,famine, or disease could have contributed to much. Also, perhaps under new leadership one of these civilizations may have decided not to get along with the other. In anycase their is much to learn, I think DNA of both peoples' is in order to further see if their is a link. In anycase this is just a theory, but if it is found to be true then our history books may have to be looked over about the first civilizations.
 
 
This was only a quick synopsis Iam in the process of writing a book about this and how it affected mankind in ways that we may never understand. Unfortunately while writing this their was a error with the site and some of the data I wrote was lost and caused me to put some parts into a puzzle piece so to speak. Some people have no care for history and perhaps they are right. Personal I believe that our future as mankind lies within our past. The discovery of our missing link shows and finally gives absolute proof to Darwinism' theory. And perhaps the discovery of Atlantis was the ultimate proof.  Afterall in 2012 the mayan society predicted the end of days to mankind using a elaborate star chart such as the Egyptians had. They must have experienced the first polar shift and in 2012 this will only help to provide more evidence.